case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
How much sway case law holds may perhaps fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To explore this concept, look at the following case law definition.
If your DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will acquire care of many of the components of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
However it really is made apparent that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make sure regard in the family lose in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been achieved. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in more info a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is additionally important to note that neither seniority nor promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could possibly be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for getting to be entitled to become regarded for promotion to a higher quality, of course, is not without logic since the officer that's originally inducted to the particular post needs to serve on the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public in the befitting fashion.
Criminal cases From the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.